membership the crew
media kit directors
archieves contacts
current issues links
   
The Network
Maximize or Moderate
 
 

Let’s face it. For the decade of the nineties, and certainly well into the first seven years of the 21st century, we Americans were living in a “Super-Size” society. When you order lunch you are offered an array of options that are always bigger and better. Triple meat hamburgers, 72 oz. sodas, a shoebox size pile of French fries, and we pack it all out to our SUV or 1 ton pickup and off we go. Heck, I think my own television is bigger than my 12 year old son. The beef industry has been just as bad by encouraging maximum output with little to no consideration for inputs.

We all love our 800 lb. weaned calves, but not until very recently have we been forced to take such a sharp look at the input side of the equation. For the first time in my life, I am looking for the cow that can get by on $200 less feed than my neighbors, not the one that weaned 40 lbs. more calf than his. The easiest way to impact the input side is to moderate our mature cowherd.
For many people the word moderate reminds them of the little pumpkins from the fifties that were no good, had little muscle and were disgustingly fat. And every one of us at some point in time still “sell ‘em by the pound”. I can’t agree more. Small, fat, light-muscled cattle have no place in today’s industry, nor do small, inefficient, poor-doing cattle either. Height is one thing; muscle, width, and pounds are another. Just because I said moderate doesn’t mean I am willing to compromise feedlot performance or carcass quality.

I don’t really care what frame score cattle you prefer, there are good ones in a lot of different sizes; we need to remember that beef cattle are three dimensional. Height alone is a poor measure of volume or performance. A 4 to 5 frame, wide-based, deep-bodied cow can easily weigh 1300- 1450 lbs. in a body condition score of 6. Mated properly, she can easily produce a steer that will gain 3.5 pounds or better, have a 14 inch rib eye, and grade choice, YG2 at 1225-1300lbs in 14-16 months. Conversely, a frame 7, narrow based, flat-sided cow may weigh 1600 lbs in the same condition, but requires a bigger pile of feed to maintain her and may wean a calf that takes an extra 30-60 days in the feedlot and kills at 1450 lbs. or more. Those steers became a whole lot less desirable about the time corn hit $5/bu. Today corn is at $6.48/bu.

Surprisingly, we as seedstock producers have very few ways to measure input costs vs. outputs to calculate profitability. Therefore selection has generally rewarded the highest output. One of the best measurements for keeping mature cow size in balance is to calculate the percentage of mature body weight weaned. Calf weaning weight/cow body weight at weaning. I hear a lot of talk about 60% figures, but even the best herds rarely reach 50%, the mid forties is where most end up. Some of the best commercial herds that do a good job of controlling mature cow size in the 1200 lb. range are able to exceed the 50% mark.

Whatever you decide is the ideal cow size for your operation, I think those who really put a pencil to the profit equation will soon find that moderate-framed, easy-fleshing, sound, fertile cows will fit the bill. I am tired of hearing that registered cattle need to be a frame score bigger than commercial. That may be good for terminal breeds, but I prefer to think of Angus as a maternal breed. I’ll bet a lot of our customers do as well…Now for the real question, how many of you have actually ever measured your entire cowherd, not calves, but mature cows. It’s pretty hard to quantify or change what we don’t measure.

Best of Luck,
Jeff Schmidt
WSAA Director